We were asked to spend time exploring it and then reflect on the following three points:
- Engagement of learner
- Quality of interaction
- Advantages and disadvantages over traditional ways of learning.
First I would like to say that we were supposed to spend 10 minutes exploring and reflecting. Here I am 25 minutes later beginning my reflection while trying not to return to the website and explore more!
So as far as the engagement of the learner goes I think that this is an amazing site. The following things are the positives I would say the site has for engagement.
- It is visually appealing on every page.
- Each page is unique but to me, that unique element does not distract from the experience but heightens it.
- One of the points the digital story makes is that the Kowloon Walled City was a maze of buildings, alleyways, and people. I think that the visual changes in the story build on that maze feeling and reinforce the chaos that many people must have imagined it to be like, yet the site also reflects the order that the residence described as the reality.
- The story uses sound, images, and text.
- The short clips are just the right length to keep the learner engaged but not lose interest because they drag on.
As for the quality of the interaction, the quality of this digital story is amazing. The elements are put together in a way that tells a story if you go from point A to point B through the site, but also tells the same story if you play a bit of alphabet soup along the way! Everything ties to something eventually. The way the stores of real people who lived within the walled city are woven throughout the site makes you the reader feel what it would have been like to live and work there.
The advantages of this type of learning platform are that a learner can attack the learning in whichever way they prefer. They can watch a video or just read the text. Nearly all of the text on the first page (People) reinforces the video, yet does not copy the video 100%. You are getting less information if you only choose one method but you are not “missing out” on the whole picture of what the walled city was like.
This type of platform allows for someone to experience through first-hand interaction a place that they may never get to visit. Having recently visited Hong Kong and hearing about the tiny apartments and “cage” houses still in Kowloon, it was very interesting for me to see what it had once been. As a way of learning, first-hand experiences are a good way for learners to connect with a learning experience and make emotional connections with them. Even if those first-hand experiences are only through video interviews and not live person to person interviews.
A disadvantage to this type of platform is that for some it can be visually overstimulating. They may get distracted easily and jump from place to place within the site without really engaging with the learning. This could be especially true when they get to the “Imagination” page and begin watching video clips of movies.
Overall I think that this is a great learning piece if you just want to get a feel for what it was like to live and work inside the walled city.
If you wanted a detailed look at any element of the walled city, I don’t think that it would achieve any level of detailed information.
Personally, I like this platform. For me, it was just the right amount of information to keep me interested in exploring without losing interest or getting off task (which is a huge problem for me!).